Feminism claims of male violence are hugely exagerated and a tiny proportion of the risks women face

-


Whenever you read a feminist site, violence towards girls, or women, form men is one of the major talking points. Whether it's sex crimes or homicide, it features predominately in discourse. Now, obviously crime is horrible, it's awful. Nobody should be attacked and the full weight of the law and law enforcement should be deployed to protect people against crime.

However whenever you dig into the statistics, or look a little closer the whole story seems rather more complicated than "horrible man beating women" which has almost become such a meme amongst feminist circles.

Here's the actual numbers, the risks that women face in life in 21st Century United Kingdom:

Activity Fatalities
Dementia 40,256
Diabetes mellitus 30,132
Alzheimer's disease 25,789
Parkinson's disease 22,456
Heart disease 18,789
Stroke 15,678
Respiratory diseases 12,345
Travelling by road 400
Homicide 156

Feminists would save more lives by campaigning against the food industry to help fight obesity. Outside of the numbers of death that women expereinced a teeny, tiny percentage is travelling by car. Even lower than that is homicide, murder. It's extremely rare. If a woman goes out for the evening her biggest risk is travelling there and back by car.

Really if a woman comes across a bear, a man and a motorcar in the middle of the woods the most dangerous thing she could do would be to eat the chocolate bar she has with her, second to that it would be to get into the car and drive off in it.

The serious point to this is just to show the inherent misandry in feminist discussions. It is there to find awful facts about men and to show how terrible men are to women. It's not based on protectng women, or making women safer. If it were they would be campainging on Road Traffic Safety. The primary purpose is to hate men and show them in the most negative light they can.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How far modern feminism has fallen from it's wonderful beginnings

-
Image
I was recently walking around London and came across a statue, I've often walked passed on Charing Cross road near Leicester Square. The statue is of Edith Cavell somebody I know little about. Edith Cavell was a nurse during World War 1 who was celebrated for treating injured soldiers on both sides of the conflict without discrimination. She was fiercely brave and helped 200 servicemen escape occupied Belgium and return to Britain. She was caught by the Germans and executed for failing to observe medical neutrality. The night before her execution this brave woman said "Patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone". This is 180 dgerees opposite to the toxic feminism that we currently see in any female space. The absolute glee which fourth wave feminists seem to take in active, bigotred, transphobia is completely unsuprising when you see how sexist & prejudiced modern feminism has become. In my view, it is no longer about equal rights. It...
Read more

The myth of women doing the majority of housework

-
Image
This is often trotted out in female spaces with depressing regularity. You can see it here , here and here  and any search of any feminist space will bring out the "Men expect women to do all the housework" trope. There are even studies on this which, on the surface, would seem to confirm that women do more housework than men.  Digging into these studies and it becomes quickly apparent they are extremely skewed and don't provide a very thorough picture. Measuring all household work There are two main methods used to measure household work done. The first is a survey, where you simply ask what chores people do, assign time to them and from that you find who is doing the most. This has the benefit that it's less intrusive, you can do a 30min survey and get your data, but you lack accuracy. A more intrusive, but more accurate method, is to keep a time diary. That is people note down what they are doing and from that you tot up the time on housework. The problem with th...
Read more

The oppressed can't be the oppresor - why feminists accept sexism in their spaces

-
Image
In any feminist space you will find misandry, quickly and easily. Whenever feminists are asked about the sexism in their spaces, or movement, they generally reply by disputing that misandry exists, minimising it's effects or with whatboutism stating that male misogyny effects women far worse. The huge problem with this is that feminism has already accepted sexism at it's core. It sees sexism everywhere and because of this has now accepted sexism.Misandric comments, ideas, man hating are all  absolutely rife in feminist spaces . Claiming that misandry is fine because the oppressed can never be the oppressor is not borne out by history which tells us a very, very different story. Oppressed people, who accept prejudice to their oppresor have a strong tradition of repeating their oppression in an even worse way. If you look at the actions of Israel in Palestine then you can see, very clearly, how an oppressed people (the Jews in World War 2) really are very, very capable of being ...
Read more