How feminists justify their misandry & hatred of men

-

 

Feminists are creative when it comes to their core business of hating men. Despite being, allegedly, pro equal rights feminists spend an inordinate amount of time hating on men. They are extremely creative as to reasons they hate men but one thing they keep coming back to is how poorly women are treated around the world: Afghanistan, Congo, Palestine. 

Feminists use a subtle trick to label ALL MEN as subhuman, as oppressors, violent, dangerous. By scouring the world and finding extreme behaviours they then attempt to label all men as similar. The thing is, any free thinking person, understands that there are extreme behaviours and significant cultural differencs around the world. Take the image above, the preacher dancing with snakes in church in the deep south of America. We all understand it's an extreme version of a behaviour, it's not commonly practised around the world. However feminists use a similar trick to then wash the entire population based on what is happening somehwere in the world.

The lack of women's rights in Afghanistan is often brought up as evidence of sexism and how awful men are. Let's be clear here, it's not just women's rights that are being curtailed in Afghanistan, it's not women only who are being targeted. Amnesty International report that the Taliban are busy making people dissapear, political opponents, religious scolars etc who disagree with them. It's not a gender that is being harmed by a brutal regime, it's an entire people.

Yet feminists will look to make capital out of this, to prove a patriachy holding women back all around the world.

By pulling out the most extreme examples of behaviour, presenting it in volume, feminists are attempting to demonstrate that women are held back and oppressed by men WORDWIDE. That is the mott and bailey fallacy that feminists often present. These awful things happen to women here (ignoring that men are hugely oppressed too, it's not gender specific) and that's why things are awful for women EVERYWHERE.

The thing is there are parts of the world which are bad for women, there are parts of the world which are bad for men, there are parts of the world where the church pastor will dance with snakes but that doesn't mean it's happening at the church in the town you live.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The myth of women doing the majority of housework

-
Image
This is often trotted out in female spaces with depressing regularity. You can see it here , here and here  and any search of any feminist space will bring out the "Men expect women to do all the housework" trope. There are even studies on this which, on the surface, would seem to confirm that women do more housework than men.  Digging into these studies and it becomes quickly apparent they are extremely skewed and don't provide a very thorough picture. Measuring all household work There are two main methods used to measure household work done. The first is a survey, where you simply ask what chores people do, assign time to them and from that you find who is doing the most. This has the benefit that it's less intrusive, you can do a 30min survey and get your data, but you lack accuracy. A more intrusive, but more accurate method, is to keep a time diary. That is people note down what they are doing and from that you tot up the time on housework. The problem with th...
Read more

How far modern feminism has fallen from it's wonderful beginnings

-
Image
I was recently walking around London and came across a statue, I've often walked passed on Charing Cross road near Leicester Square. The statue is of Edith Cavell somebody I know little about. Edith Cavell was a nurse during World War 1 who was celebrated for treating injured soldiers on both sides of the conflict without discrimination. She was fiercely brave and helped 200 servicemen escape occupied Belgium and return to Britain. She was caught by the Germans and executed for failing to observe medical neutrality. The night before her execution this brave woman said "Patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone". This is 180 dgerees opposite to the toxic feminism that we currently see in any female space. The absolute glee which fourth wave feminists seem to take in active, bigotred, transphobia is completely unsuprising when you see how sexist & prejudiced modern feminism has become. In my view, it is no longer about equal rights. It...
Read more

The oppressed can't be the oppresor - why feminists accept sexism in their spaces

-
Image
In any feminist space you will find misandry, quickly and easily. Whenever feminists are asked about the sexism in their spaces, or movement, they generally reply by disputing that misandry exists, minimising it's effects or with whatboutism stating that male misogyny effects women far worse. The huge problem with this is that feminism has already accepted sexism at it's core. It sees sexism everywhere and because of this has now accepted sexism.Misandric comments, ideas, man hating are all  absolutely rife in feminist spaces . Claiming that misandry is fine because the oppressed can never be the oppressor is not borne out by history which tells us a very, very different story. Oppressed people, who accept prejudice to their oppresor have a strong tradition of repeating their oppression in an even worse way. If you look at the actions of Israel in Palestine then you can see, very clearly, how an oppressed people (the Jews in World War 2) really are very, very capable of being ...
Read more