The Anti Feminist Liberal

  A new study has been published which suggests men are evaluated on their competence to do a job but women are evaluated way more stringently and are also evaluated against their morality and sociability too. The feminists of reddit seize on this, add their own lived experiences, and before you know it we have yet more proof that the patriachy bogeyman is holding women back. " Not to make this political, but look at how Kamala was judged. She was a DEI despite having a fairly illustrious career in politics and being an Attorney’s General among other positions while Trump was a felon with a terrible first presidential term and no political experience outside of that first term. Our country is literally in shambles because of misogyny . " I do wonder how many of those feminists even click on the link to read the actual study, which can be found here . If you, take the time to read it, you can find it's fairly flawed and nothing like as clear cut as the title would suggest....

  Feminist spaces are full of angry women. Angry at everything and anybody remotely male. The gripes are often the patriachy bogeyman and misogyny. The visitors to these forums are so triggered, so unhappy, that they seem to find fault in anything they can. From a car rental issue being resolved, at the end, the same time a feminist cc'd their male partner into the email or a woman who got turned down for a job and the ONLY reason it could be is misogyny. Online forums create angry women who see the ghost of the patriachy bogeyman absolutely everywhere. The last concept from any angry feminist's mind is that correlation does not necessarily mean causation : There are more TV aerials in the USA than in Africa HIV is more pevalent in Africa than the USA Therefore TV Aerials prevent HIV My guess is that sociology, and in particular Women's Studies university courses, do not teach statistical analysis, or much mathematics on their courses. The  Oxford University Women's S...

  One of the things that keeps coming back, from feminist spaces, is how awful marriage is for women. It's hard to know what drives this narrative but it's something that keeps coming back repetetively for example in South Korea's 4b movement . The 4b movement, if you have been on another planet and not heard of it, is about decentering men and involves the following tenants: No sex with men No giving birth No dating men No marriage to men  Let's start by taking a look at the often quoted statistic that female suicide rates dropoed 20% when no fault divorce was legalised in 1970. Many radical feminist will throw this out when discussing how bad marriage is for women.  Looking at Statistic there was indeed a 20% drop, in the 1970s of female suicide rates  and yes California was the first to legalise no fault divorce in 1969. We do know though, that the devil is in the detail, and feminists have a rich history of cherry picking the stats they want to support their cas...

One of the, many, arguments a misandrist will say, to show men as awful, is that they are statistically more likely to leave their wives if the wife becomes chronically ill, or disabled , and he is expected to be the caretaker.  This is following a study in 2015 which tracked 2,701 marriages and found that the onset of a wfe's illness is more likely associated with an elevated risk of divorce. So yes, men, the swine, are more likely to leave a sick wife than a wife is to leave a sick man. As always though, these things are not quite as cut and dry as the average, angry, feminist would have you believe. They point to it as another form of misogyny and how women are constantly held back by patriachy and, as per usual, awful, horrible, men. The thing is even getting to that point where a marriage has lasted long enough for illness onset in later life is incredibly rare. Sadly 42% of marriages, in the UK, end in divorce .The courts usually award child custody to the mother, fathers l...

I recently read an experience from a feminist complaining that her boss was asking her to where high heeled shoes for her job. Obviously every other woman on the feminst forum piled on in to tell her that she should wear whatever she damn well pleases and that the boss is obviously a man and has no right. The thing is the lady admits she is working with clients and the boss is telling her that it looks more professional when she wears heels as opposed to flat shoes. Now whether he is right or wrong, is immaterial. It is his business, he thinks that looks better, it's his job to keep everyone employed and he's clearly communicating that these things out. Rather than accept it she's just complaining about it. She argues about it, and the rest of the feminist's arguments about it are typically hysterical I don't want to leave my job because I need it, and heels aren't officially part of the dress code, but it's something that my boss obviously feels very strong...

Whenever you read a feminist site, violence towards girls, or women, form men is one of the major talking points. Whether it's sex crimes or homicide, it features predominately in discourse. Now, obviously crime is horrible, it's awful. Nobody should be attacked and the full weight of the law and law enforcement should be deployed to protect people against crime. However whenever you dig into the statistics, or look a little closer the whole story seems rather more complicated than "horrible man beating women" which has almost become such a meme amongst feminist circles. Here's the actual numbers, the risks that women face in life in 21st Century United Kingdom: Activity Fatalities Dementia 40,256 Diabetes mellitus 30,132 Alzheimer's disease 25,789 ...

  Often, when reading feminist spaces, they are simply depressing. Women are hopelessly held back, unable to progress or achieve anything, by a system of oppression called patriachy. Misogyny, with men hating women, means they are unable to ever achieve anything. For men it's so much easier to achieve they have all of the benefits and none of the disadvantages. The world of feminism has elaborate theories and data to back this up. Women do the majority of housework ( incorrect ), women are paid less ( incorrect ) and a host of other excuses. The thing is, let's be honest. Being successful is super, super difficult. It takes hard work, dedication, skill, talent, ability, charm, ruthlesness, drive. It's exceptionally rare in the majority of people. Unfortunately 90% of the population can't be the top 10% in terms of success. The numbers can NEVER work out. When women fail they have a whole industry there to explain it. It was the patriachy again, or the gender pay gap, or...

Women's spaces will often lament algorithms serving up misgonystic content to young boys and radicalising them into the  Manosphere .The blame for this is often directed at various places: men going to the right, search algorithms or any number of places but never at the most obvious cause of this itself. Search engines, Instagram etc are serving Andrew Tate content to young, teenage, boys within 2 hours of the account being created . It's a neat, scape goat for what is happening isn't it ? Big internet companies are servive up misgynistic content and radicalising a group of teenage boys and causing mayhem for girls. This theory wholeheartedly absolves anyone of any wrong doing and explains why teenage boys are being beastly to innocent teenage girls. Firstly search algorithms are serving up content they think you will like, what is popular. It is serving up Andrew Tate because he is saying something that other teenage boys have bought into and so the algorithm is serving ...

In any feminist space you will find misandry, quickly and easily. Whenever feminists are asked about the sexism in their spaces, or movement, they generally reply by disputing that misandry exists, minimising it's effects or with whatboutism stating that male misogyny effects women far worse. The huge problem with this is that feminism has already accepted sexism at it's core. It sees sexism everywhere and because of this has now accepted sexism.Misandric comments, ideas, man hating are all  absolutely rife in feminist spaces . Claiming that misandry is fine because the oppressed can never be the oppressor is not borne out by history which tells us a very, very different story. Oppressed people, who accept prejudice to their oppresor have a strong tradition of repeating their oppression in an even worse way. If you look at the actions of Israel in Palestine then you can see, very clearly, how an oppressed people (the Jews in World War 2) really are very, very capable of being ...

I recently came across this posting where a woman complains how she was subjeted to misogyny.  "I SWEAR THIS IS WHY THEY CHANGED THEIR MINDS A few months ago I rented a car, had no issues, and returned it. Got a call that the car was damaged and I needed to cover the repairs. I had photos from right before I returned it (hotel camera) showing that the car was fine, so I called and emailed but couldn't get hold of anyone who could help and my emails went unanswered. This went on for two months. Then a bill for $2500+ showed up in the mail, even though I still hadn't heard from anyone. Eventually, since I hadn't paid the bill, a claims person was assigned to me. She sent an appeal to their dispute team. The dispute team never called, never emailed, didn't answer my email. But about a week later I got two letters on the same day: one said they were aware of my appeal, one said they were dismissing my appeal. On the same day. No explanation.  On a whim, I sent one las...

A recent study has found that yes, misandry is real, yet feminists continuously deny it exists. Why ? Spend any time on a feminist space and you'll find man hating within a minute. Garaunteed! I often play this game, visit Mums Net Feminism or any feminist space, start a timer and see how long it takes until I find a misandrist post.  Let's do it now..... Ok, 25s after being on MumsNet here's the  first misandrist post . Often when you read feminist spaces, or watch their YouTube videos, they will be sexist, bigoted and prejudiced. Anti men. Whenever feminists are confronted about misandry in their communities they will always either play dumb ("What do you mean by misandry?"), deny it exists ("Misandry is a myth by men to derail feminist conversations"), start with Whatboutism  ("Misandry is nothing compared to the systematic misogyny women have endured for thousands of years") or simply minimise ("Misandry is just a 14 year old girl sayi...