The Anti Feminist Liberal

This image is something that is often pushed out by feminist circles. It's the public relations face of a deeply toxic, hate movement. It claims to be equal rights, on the face it LOOKS equal rights but underneath the evidence points to a very, very different agenda. Whilst feminists will swear blind that misandry doesn't exist research, published in nature has proven that feminist communities are extreme and contain outright hostility and hatred towards men. They don't just dislike men, even though they are particularly called out for hate, they often hate homosexual people, trans people and lesbian, feminist, women only communities have a history of hating non white, working class people too . It's startingly easy to find misandry and hate within the feminist movement. I often play a game where I read a feminist forum and see how long it takes to find misandry or any other prejudiced bigotry. Usually you can do this in less than a minute. If they are taking a break f...

Another meme, doing the roads is about how men don't emotionally support their wives which is the alleged findings from a Harvard study. You may have seen this being circulated on Facebook, reddit and all of the other usual channels. The thing is the interpretation of the results are at best fanicful. If you read the actual study there some glaring issues with it. You can read the study yourself here . Something that is taken out of context is the following synopsis:  "When Tim came home after emotionally draining days in the classroom, both he and Lisa reported that he was a poor listener. He seemed distracted during Lisa’s recollections about her day and showed less affection and concern for her feelings in general. Consequently, the couple rated the time they spent together as a family worse — tense and less enjoyable. We observed this pattern throughout our sample. When husbands had stressful workdays with extensive emotional demands, they provided less suppo...

  Feminists are creative when it comes to their core business of hating men. Despite being, allegedly, pro equal rights feminists spend an inordinate amount of time hating on men. They are extremely creative as to reasons they hate men but one thing they keep coming back to is how poorly women are treated around the world: Afghanistan, Congo, Palestine.  Feminists use a subtle trick to label ALL MEN as subhuman, as oppressors, violent, dangerous. By scouring the world and finding extreme behaviours they then attempt to label all men as similar. The thing is, any free thinking person, understands that there are extreme behaviours and significant cultural differencs around the world. Take the image above, the preacher dancing with snakes in church in the deep south of America. We all understand it's an extreme version of a behaviour, it's not commonly practised around the world. However feminists use a similar trick to then wash the entire population based on what is happening ...

  Feminists have turned denial of their own sexism into an art form. It's an idea that is now so deep routed into feminist ideology it's unlikely that feminism can ever recover from it's own, rampant sexism. Femnists are using the well trodden path of DARVO in order to explain why it is absoluely fine for feminists to practise sexism. DARVO stands for the following: D eny - Deny any wrongdoing A ttack - Attack the credibility, character or motivation to undermine any claims R everse V ictim & O ffender - The perpetrator claims to be the real victim casting the accuser as the real aggressor A recent discussion came up which demonstates feminist's response to misandry: " This happened in school when one topic about a teacher came up. So she’s a new substitute and me and my 2-3 friends talk to her as timepass. Apparently she had made a statement that she dislikes men and that girls shouldn’t trust boys so easily. She basically said a bunch of stuff stemming from ...

 If you consider this meme it is extremely obvious what it is saying. It is talking about male redditors and how if people say anything homophobic, they laugh. If they say anything about minorities, or women then they laugh. However if a woman says anything about men being bad then male redditors will write pages and pages of text refuting. It's very obvious what the meme is saying and is a piece of misandric sexism that is often found in feminist spaces, in this case it was from "Radical Feminists" but was crossposted to other feminist sub reddits too. It received over 700 upvotes, likely more as we can't see how many downvotes the 700 upvotes had to over come. That is at least 700 people liked this and agree with it. When I suggested that this was sexist the feminists start to defend it. To any free thinking person how can this be defenceable ? It's outright misandry ? Well the way it is defended is with the tried and tested "All men"  counter. Reading...

  Feminists are the queens of double standards. The recent hack of the tea application is an absolute perfect example of this. Tea was an app that allowed women to swap notes on men they were dating. They would share facebook profiles, names, images and other PII (personally indetifiable information) for other women to freely access. Then, the app makers were hacked. The hackers took all of the data of the users and publically put it out on 4chan. Female users, the personal name, data and images were put out for all to see. The outcry on this, from Feminists cirlces, has been overwhelming. Women complaining how unfair it was and how awful it has been. The irony seemingly completely lost that women are upset, their data was spilt onto the internet for doing precisely what they themselves were doing. The thing is with this it shows the absolute double standards that feminists are so keen to indulge in. Often the reason given is "Women's safety" and that's why they wish ...

  Often we hear from women lamenting how men don't hold other men to account for misogyny . Why don't men do that ? Why do they let sexist jokes slide ? Why don't they correct other men when they are being sexist ? The answer to this is the same reason as to why women never, ever hold each other to account. Misogyny is heavily policed, prosecuted. The UK government is insisting that Adolesence is shown in UK schools . It's a  fictional  drama, about a boy who is radcialised, online, and stabs a female pupil. A month after the drama was shown there was the real case of a girl who went to school and stabbed two teachers . The response from the government ? Nothing. Are men calling out other men enough ? There's always more you can do, of course there always is. The equalities act, the air time that eveil men harming innocent women get, there's a lot being done to call men out on misogyny. Women and misandry ? Not so much. There are entire sub reddits showing th...

  Before the 4B movement (a radical feminist movement that aims to remove men from women's lives) there were several attempts to set up women only camps. Often, in feminist circles, women dream of this freedom. Men being removed, women not having to live in fear and life is basically unicorns and rainbows. The obvious question, that nobody seems to ask is "If it's such a great idea why aren't these things common ?". Any feminist post touting the idea will have hundreds of women commenting how great it will be and how they want this to happen. So let's look at what has happened to these attempts in the past. If it's so great why do they all fail ? Surely women freed from the patriachy bogeyman, with no men to oppress them are going to go on to do amazing things ? Surely ? Well, they all fail. There's been a few attempts in the past for example "Camp Sister Spirt" founded in 1993, closed in 2010. It had a good run, 17 years before it inevitabl...

  One of the many gripes women have is the gender pay gap. According to wikipedia pay gap, allegedly, manifests itself in two ways Women are paid the same as men but generally work less hours and so end up with less money Women are paid less for exactly the same labour as men On the face of it, looking at that data, gosh it's the evil bogeyman patriachy holding women back, yet again. As always though what lies beneath it is way more subtle and really, put the claims under a microscope and they evaporate away. The first observation to make, in the EU at least, women just work fewer hours than men . For whatever reason women choose to work fewer hours and so have less money as a result. Is this really a gender pay gap ? Or is this free choice with women choosing that money is less important to them than other activities ? Do they value the flexibility of working less hours prioritising their children ? Isn't it, perhaps, fortunate they have the ability to to enjoy that ability ...

" I’m on the way home from a long trip that included three separate flights each way. In most of these flights, I saw this family seating pattern over and over: Parents in adjacent aisle seats, with the kids next to the woman. That left the man free to drink or sleep, while the woman handled all the child care. This seemed to me like such a powerful illustration of the patriarchy in action. I guess when you have kids, only men get vacations. " So writes one woman seeing the patriachy bogeyman everywhere. These sorts of posts always make me smile as they are invariably written by young woman who have yet to have children themselvs. They are looking at family life, through naivety, a child's position, and seeing things from an very limited view point. The thing is having children is a huge upheavel in your life. The life that you knew before, care free (taking long trips with three seperate flights each way for example) doesn't really exist anymore. It can do but it...

A new sensation has oppened in Australia, a women's only night club. That's right men are denied entry based purely on gender. The club is called The Black Out Room and takes place in The Aberdeen Hotel , in Perth. The comments on Facebook have been, well not entirely happy about things. This has galvanised the two women, running the club, into a defiance.  This is not the first time that Australia has set up openly misandrist venues. There was a vegan cafe, "Handsome Her" which opened up in Melbourne in 2017 which openly charged men more to use the cafe. Men enjoyed an 18% surchage to cover the widely debunked Gender Pay Gap. 2 Years later and Handsome Her had to close down . It feels that running a business is tough enough but is even harder if you are openly discriminating against 50% of your potential customer base. The thing is, these ventures force us to ask what sort of society we want to be. If we are going to be truly equal rights, then we need to practise w...

  The problem with lived experience is that it's often proffered as evidence as to why a certain thing is the way it is. Feminist circles often use this to push the narrative that "All men are trash". Page after page of how awful men have been are offfered and it shows a compelling picture. The thing is that this "lived experience" is not really evidence of anything. We all know the odds of winning the UK national lottery are approximately 1 in 14 million . This is the equivalent of tossing a coin and getting heads 21 times in a row. It's extremely unlikely, yet there were 383 winners in 2024 . The majority of people will accept that winning the lottery is extremely unlikely. However if you are in a large enough population then there will likely be a few lottery winners there. "It's really unlikely you will win the lottery", "Well I did!", "Yes and so did I". It starts to feel that those incredibly long odds are actually mo...

  A new study has been published which suggests men are evaluated on their competence to do a job but women are evaluated way more stringently and are also evaluated against their morality and sociability too. The feminists of reddit seize on this, add their own lived experiences, and before you know it we have yet more proof that the patriachy bogeyman is holding women back. " Not to make this political, but look at how Kamala was judged. She was a DEI despite having a fairly illustrious career in politics and being an Attorney’s General among other positions while Trump was a felon with a terrible first presidential term and no political experience outside of that first term. Our country is literally in shambles because of misogyny . " I do wonder how many of those feminists even click on the link to read the actual study, which can be found here . If you, take the time to read it, you can find it's fairly flawed and nothing like as clear cut as the title would suggest....

  Feminist spaces are full of angry women. Angry at everything and anybody remotely male. The gripes are often the patriachy bogeyman and misogyny. The visitors to these forums are so triggered, so unhappy, that they seem to find fault in anything they can. From a car rental issue being resolved, at the end, the same time a feminist cc'd their male partner into the email or a woman who got turned down for a job and the ONLY reason it could be is misogyny. Online forums create angry women who see the ghost of the patriachy bogeyman absolutely everywhere. The last concept from any angry feminist's mind is that correlation does not necessarily mean causation : There are more TV aerials in the USA than in Africa HIV is more pevalent in Africa than the USA Therefore TV Aerials prevent HIV My guess is that sociology, and in particular Women's Studies university courses, do not teach statistical analysis, or much mathematics on their courses. The  Oxford University Women's S...

  One of the things that keeps coming back, from feminist spaces, is how awful marriage is for women. It's hard to know what drives this narrative but it's something that keeps coming back repetetively for example in South Korea's 4b movement . The 4b movement, if you have been on another planet and not heard of it, is about decentering men and involves the following tenants: No sex with men No giving birth No dating men No marriage to men  Let's start by taking a look at the often quoted statistic that female suicide rates dropoed 20% when no fault divorce was legalised in 1970. Many radical feminist will throw this out when discussing how bad marriage is for women.  Looking at Statistic there was indeed a 20% drop, in the 1970s of female suicide rates  and yes California was the first to legalise no fault divorce in 1969. We do know though, that the devil is in the detail, and feminists have a rich history of cherry picking the stats they want to support their cas...

One of the, many, arguments a misandrist will say, to show men as awful, is that they are statistically more likely to leave their wives if the wife becomes chronically ill, or disabled , and he is expected to be the caretaker.  This is following a study in 2015 which tracked 2,701 marriages and found that the onset of a wfe's illness is more likely associated with an elevated risk of divorce. So yes, men, the swine, are more likely to leave a sick wife than a wife is to leave a sick man. As always though, these things are not quite as cut and dry as the average, angry, feminist would have you believe. They point to it as another form of misogyny and how women are constantly held back by patriachy and, as per usual, awful, horrible, men. The thing is even getting to that point where a marriage has lasted long enough for illness onset in later life is incredibly rare. Sadly 42% of marriages, in the UK, end in divorce .The courts usually award child custody to the mother, fathers l...

I recently read an experience from a feminist complaining that her boss was asking her to where high heeled shoes for her job. Obviously every other woman on the feminst forum piled on in to tell her that she should wear whatever she damn well pleases and that the boss is obviously a man and has no right. The thing is the lady admits she is working with clients and the boss is telling her that it looks more professional when she wears heels as opposed to flat shoes. Now whether he is right or wrong, is immaterial. It is his business, he thinks that looks better, it's his job to keep everyone employed and he's clearly communicating that these things out. Rather than accept it she's just complaining about it. She argues about it, and the rest of the feminist's arguments about it are typically hysterical I don't want to leave my job because I need it, and heels aren't officially part of the dress code, but it's something that my boss obviously feels very strong...

Whenever you read a feminist site, violence towards girls, or women, form men is one of the major talking points. Whether it's sex crimes or homicide, it features predominately in discourse. Now, obviously crime is horrible, it's awful. Nobody should be attacked and the full weight of the law and law enforcement should be deployed to protect people against crime. However whenever you dig into the statistics, or look a little closer the whole story seems rather more complicated than "horrible man beating women" which has almost become such a meme amongst feminist circles. Here's the actual numbers, the risks that women face in life in 21st Century United Kingdom: Activity Fatalities Dementia 40,256 Diabetes mellitus 30,132 Alzheimer's disease 25,789 ...

  Often, when reading feminist spaces, they are simply depressing. Women are hopelessly held back, unable to progress or achieve anything, by a system of oppression called patriachy. Misogyny, with men hating women, means they are unable to ever achieve anything. For men it's so much easier to achieve they have all of the benefits and none of the disadvantages. The world of feminism has elaborate theories and data to back this up. Women do the majority of housework ( incorrect ), women are paid less ( incorrect ) and a host of other excuses. The thing is, let's be honest. Being successful is super, super difficult. It takes hard work, dedication, skill, talent, ability, charm, ruthlesness, drive. It's exceptionally rare in the majority of people. Unfortunately 90% of the population can't be the top 10% in terms of success. The numbers can NEVER work out. When women fail they have a whole industry there to explain it. It was the patriachy again, or the gender pay gap, or...